![]() ![]() ![]() 25 deals with freedom of expression in the context of participation in public affairs and the right to vote. the relationship between articles 19 and 20.įreedom of information, expression & democracy.the scope for limitations on freedom of expression in certain areas.the application of Article 19.3 on permissible limitations on freedom of information and expression.the importance of freedom of expression in a democratic society. ![]() This General Comment addresses in detail: General Comment 34 emphasises that freedom of expression and opinion are the foundation stone for a free and democratic society and a necessary condition for the promotion and protection of human rights. ( b ) For the protection of national security or of public order, or of public health or morals. ![]() ( a ) For respect of the rights or reputations of others It may therefore be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are provided by law and are necessary: The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article carries with it special duties and responsibilities.Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice.Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference.That freedom is fundamental to our University, our society, and our nation.The UN General Assembly adopted the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) on 16 December 1966. While Rutgers will not defend the content of every opinion expressed by every member of our academic community, or of speakers who we invite to our campus, it will defend their right to speak freely. In all cases, however, the conduct of a faculty member must be in accordance with standards dictated by law. In addition, they also enjoy academic freedom of expression when functioning in their roles as faculty members. Faculty members, as private citizens, enjoy the same freedoms of speech and expression as any private citizen and shall be free from institutional discipline in the exercise of these rights. All members of our community enjoy the rights of free expression guaranteed by the First Amendment. Our University policy on speech is clear. Our University is a community of diverse ideas we value academic freedom’s protections that enable our faculty to state their views and engage in lively discourse.īoth academic freedom and our First Amendment rights are at the core of what we do. And we do not restrict the activities of recognized university organizations, including the speakers they invite to campus, as long as these organizations follow University policy and guidelines.įurthermore, academic freedom-the right of our faculty in the discharge of their duties to express their ideas and to challenge the ideas of others without fear of retribution-is a cornerstone of American higher education. Having said that, all members of our community-our faculty members, students, alumni, and staff-are free to express their viewpoints in public forums as private citizens, including viewpoints that the University itself may not share. Such comments do not represent the position of the University, nor should they be construed as having been expressed on behalf of the University. Some of the comments, expressions, and displays have been offensive to many and have been inconsistent with the commitment Rutgers has to reasoned discussion, mutual respect and balanced points of view. From time to time, people in and outside the Rutgers community have raised concerns regarding comments and expressions made by Rutgers faculty members, by students, and by speakers on our campuses. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |